Essay about Bad Haircut Stories of the Seventies by Tom...

Everyone faces varying degrees of peer pressure at least once in their lifetime, but what matters is how one reacts. In Bad Haircut—a collection of short stories—the author, Tom Perrotta, examines the effect of peer pressure on the main character, Buddy, in a comical yet informative light. Buddy faces peer pressure consistently and ends up associating with the wrong people, due to a lack of backbone. Yet Buddy is different and a better person than those who he associates with because he is compassionate and able to recognize that he is a follower; therein lies the irony that only the reader sees Buddy’s merit while the other characters only see the results of his friends’ poor judgment. Buddy’s sense of right from wrong is strong to†¦show more content†¦What is also ironic is the fact that Buddy is a part of the Boy Scouts, something that’s supposed to be instilling America’s best values in young men, yet his troop is far from â€Å"America’s best.† This is a reoccurring theme in Bad Haircut, whereby Buddy associates himself with groups that are supposed to have a good reputation, but instead are spoiled by bad people. During his teenage years, little had changed for Buddy and his choice of friends. One would think that a good but weak child would overcome his difficulties, but instead of progressing from his small act of bravado during Boy Scouts, Buddy’s reputation and friend choices went south. After a dance Buddy follows his friends along for a race riot, conspiring with the likes of people like â€Å"Rat Man† and Norman LaVerne, famed for running over a cat â€Å"with a lawn mower† (Perrotta 50). Even though the riot gets broken up, Buddy still manages to weasel his way back into a sticky situation. Once the plan is set to steal an African-American boy’s basketball, Buddy doesn’t â€Å"object, even though I had to do the dirty work† (Perrotta 63). Buddy does exactly what he’s told and steals the basketball, just like a little drone should. But the reader sees his compassion right after he steals the ball because Buddy â€Å"couldn’t shake the feeling that I held his head in my hand† (Perrotta 64). His guilt and contemplation are further expressed once he comes home late for curfew with the basketball and faces his

Essay about Should Marijuana be Legalized - 968 Words

Should marijuana be legalized for recreational or medical use? This is a debate that has been happening for quite some time and this is not just a debate that is happening among people. There are many that have taken sides including medical personal and government officials. Currently in the United States there are two states in which recreational use of marijuana is legal; Colorado and Washington. There are three states currently that have pending legislation to legalize recreational use; California, Maine, and Oregon. On the other hand there are 21 states in which medical use of marijuana is legal; Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, DC, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New†¦show more content†¦Let’s also assume that marijuana costs $15 a gram and of those 75,000,000 people smoking they smoke 5 grams a week. After calculations of 5 grams a week at $15 a gram times the 75,000,000 people that use, the t otal revenue would be $5,625,000,000, most of which if regulated by the government would be profit. Would it be more beneficial to society for this substantial amount of money to continue to be made by the illegal drug trade or the economy? Legalizing marijuana would also create jobs. The government would need to employ many Americans to produce and regulate the sales and distribution of the product. Facilities to grow and sell the product would be required and therefore people to run the facilities would be required. Another bonus is the fact that law enforcement can focus on other more serious crime issues within the community, instead of utilizing time and resources on marijuana. The number of people arrested yearly for marijuana offenses outweighs the total number arrested for violent crimes including murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. This also puts a strain on the prison systems that house these offenders which are mostly hard working Americans who simply smoke to relax. While these are all good points those who oppose the legalization state that marijuana is still a drug that alters perception, it is addictive, and long term useShow MoreRelatedShould Marijuana Be Legalized?849 Words   |  4 Pageswhether marijuana should be legalized. Around 23 states have legalized marijuana for medical and recreational use. In the state of Illinois, medicinal use of marijuana has been passed on April 17, 2013. Since January 2014, patients are able to obtain marijuana with a doctor s recommendation. The new debate is whether marijuana should be legalized for the general public as a recreational drug. Although some believe that marijuana is harmless, and that it has beneficial medicinal uses, marijuana shouldRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1715 Words   |  7 PagesMarijuana in Society Cannabis, formally known as marijuana is a drug obtained from the tops, stems and leaves of the hemp plant cannabis. The drug is one of the most commonly used drugs in the world. Only substances like caffeine, nicotine and alcohol are used more (â€Å"Marijuana† 1). In the U. S. where some use it to feel â€Å"high† or get an escape from reality. The drug is referred to in many ways; weed, grass, pot, and or reefer are some common names used to describe the drug (â€Å"Marijuana† 1). Like mostRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1489 Words   |  6 Pagescannabis plant or marijuana is intended for use of a psychoactive drug or medicine. It is used for recreational or medical uses. In some religions, marijuana is predominantly used for spiritual purposes. Cannabis is indigenous to central and south Asia. Cannabis has been scientifically proven that you can not die from smoking marijuana. Marijuana should be legalized to help people with medical benefits, econo mic benefits, and criminal benefits. In eight states, marijuana was legalized for recreationalRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1245 Words   |  5 PagesMarijuana is a highly debatable topic that is rapidly gaining attention in society today.   Legalizing marijuana can benefit the economy of this nation through the creation of jobs, increased tax revenue, and a decrease in taxpayer money spent on law enforcement.   Ã‚  Many people would outlaw alcohol, cigarettes, fast food, gambling, and tanning beds because of the harmful effects they have on members of a society, but this is the United States of America; the land of the free and we should give peopleRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1010 Words   |  5 PagesThe legalization of marijuana became a heated political subject in the last few years. Twenty-one states in America have legalized medical marijuana. Colorado and Washington are the only states where marijuana can be purchased recreationally. Marijuana is the high THC level part of the cannabis plant, which gives users the â€Å"high† feeling. There is ample evidence that supports the argument that marijuana is beneficial. The government should legalize marijuana recreationally for three main reasonsRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1231 Words   |  5 Pagesshows the positive benefits of marijuana, it remains illegal under federal law. In recent years, numerous states have defied federal law and legalized marijuana for both recreational and medicinal use. Arizona has legalized marijuana for medical use, but it still remains illegal to use recreationally. This is absurd, as the evidence gathered over the last few decades strongly supports the notion that it is safer than alcohol, a widely available substance. Marijuana being listed as a Schedule I drugRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1350 Words   |  6 Pagespolitics in the past decade would have to be the legalization of marijuana. The sale and production of marijuana have been legalized for medicinal uses in over twenty states and has been legalized for recreational uses in seven states. Despite the ongoing support for marijuana, it has yet to be fully legalized in the federal level due to cultural bias against â€Å"pot† smoking and the focus over its negative effects. However, legalizing marijuana has been proven to decrease the rate of incrimination in AmericaRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized? Essay1457 Words   |  6 PagesSHOULD MARIJUANA BE LEGALIZED? Marijuana is a drug that has sparked much controversy over the past decade as to whether or not it should be legalized. People once thought of marijuana as a bad, mind-altering drug which changes a person’s personality which can lead to crime and violence through selling and buying it. In the past, the majority of citizens believed that marijuana is a harmful drug that should be kept off the market and out of the hands of the public. However, a recent study conductedRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1145 Words   |  5 PagesLegalizing Marijuana Marijuana is a drug that has been actively used for centuries. This drug can be traced back to 2737 BC by the Chinese emperor Shen Nung. He spoke about the euphoric effects of Cannabis and even referred to it as the â€Å"Liberator of Sin.† Since early on, marijuana was seen as a medicinal plant that was recommended for medical uses. Marijuana is currently in schedule I, which means that physicians are not allowed to prescribe it in the United States (Hart, Ksir 2013). This drugRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1596 Words   |  7 Pages But what needs to be known before a user can safely and completely make the decision if trying Marijuana is a good idea? Many do not want the drug to be legalized because they claim that Cannabis is a â€Å"gateway drug†, meaning it will cause people to try harder drugs once their body builds up a resistance to Marijuana, because a stronger drug will be needed to reach a high state. This argument is often falsely related to the m edical side of the debate over legalization. It is claimed that this would

Contract Agreement

Question: What is the concept of a contract and when can an agreement be termed as a contract? Answer: The matter given here is about Henrietta and her engagement with a solicitor firm. She seeks relief from the firm regarding a personal disturbance causing her nuisance. The incident and her engagement explain that there was a presence of contract between them, and hence, they can be termed as the party to the contract. Now the question arises that what is the concept of a contract and when can an agreement be termed as a contract? The answer to the question is that a contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two concerned parties with the presence of a willful consent and under goodwill (McKendrick 2014). The contract has different forms, but the fundamental rule of the contract is to have an offer and an acceptance of the proposal or the offer.The agreement or the contract comes with the property of legal enforceability, so if there is an absence of the mentioned property, then that will turn into a breach of contract. Upon such cases, the concerned party is liable to comp ensate aggrieved party since the good faith is hampered and caused some amount of mental distress. A similar property is noticed in the given matter, where the clerk made the matter worse due to the incompetence and lack of experience that caused her mental distress. Discussion: The matter given here explains that Henrietta's engagement with the solicitor firm makes them liable to dispose of the duty as promised under the clause of the agreement. Since the contract is legally enforceable hence the offeror becomes responsible to the offeree, (Furmston, et al. 2012). The act of the firms handling the matter to the inexperienced and unqualified clerk created a breach of contract. The act not only caused mental distress to Henrietta but also made the matter worse and her problem increased instead of attaining relief causing her mental distress.The agreement occurred with the voluntary consent from Henrietta with the good faith that the problem will solve with the working of experienced people, but later the firm hampered her good faith. The similar situation is observed in the case of Alcatel Australia Ltd v Scarcella, where the court observed that there must be a presence of good faith during the formation of the agreement. The parties involved are expected to understand the terms of a contract and must be well informed about the clauses in clear language, and there must be an absence of doubt before the commencement of the agreement. The amendments intended to be well informed to the party before the commencement of the agreement which otherwise causes mental agony and harassment to the party. The famous matter of Balfour v Balfour decided at the high Court in Australia observed the same property of presence of an intention for creating an agreement. As explained by (Chen-Wishart 2012), there is a presence of some vitiating terms in the contract. The vitiating terms of the contract are some of the negative factors in an agreement explaining the discussion of frustration, wrong assumptions, non-disclosure, duress and above all misrepresentation.The primary concern of the debate in this matter regards the mental distress and the damage caused due to the breach of the disability required to explore the contract. The concept of the mental ag ony is put forward by different views of the scholar explaining various effects occurring from such mental distress. As explained by (Taskar 2015), the claim presented by the party regarding the mental distress due to the unfulfillment of the responsibility and the duty gets imposed upon the concerned party who is responsible for such damage. The same factor observed in the matter of Addis v. Gramophone co. also in the case of Trans Trust S.P.R.L v. Danubian Trading Co, where the suggestion of the courts decision explained about the availability of the damages caused due to the inconsistency from the party while disposing of duty towards the other party. A very famous case of Bliss v. South East Thames Regional Health Authority took here for reference best suited to explain the situation of the matter of Henrietta. The court explained that for the party in mental distress there is an availability of the damages irrespective of what is described and mentioned as the terms of the cont ract. The court even explained that the damages get limited within a particular stage of the contract. The compensation for the mental damage should be in a form providing recovery of the mental distress and cause of agony to the aggrieved, (Cartwright 2014).The fundamental principle is that the disability of the contract occurred because of the partys inability to fulfill the liability as imposed and promised under the contractual agreement, (Willmott et al. 2013). It is a concept of mere rationalization of the breach of the contract where the inability causes agony and emotionally distressed. However, the realm of the mental distress increases with the rationality of the inability. Vorvis v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, the court observed that some confusion were there that needed to be cleared regarding the concept of the distress and humiliation that falls under the liability for the covering damage in the form of compensation(Harder 2014).The intention to mention the various cases is to relate the matter and observe as similar facts happen to Henrietta mentioned as the aggrieved party in the given situation. The mentioning of the case even holds the intention that she will come to know her rights under the damage caused due to the breach of contract. The corrective procedure will be same as in the case of the matters mentioned for referring the condition of Henrietta. On support of the statements, the following facts to be mentioned as the rights of Henrietta from the solicitor firm due to the breach of contract:1. The duty not performed with good faith and classified as the breach of contract. If the solicitor firm was not competent to provide the service as promised, they are liable to inform the same during the formation of the contract, known as the anticipatory breach. In such matters, the party may ask for partial damage compensation and has an assumption about the competency of the party. Exceptions can be there since there was an ass umption beforehand and the party did not breach the promissory note in a full sense. 2. Delivering of the incomplete performance explains the lack of fulfillment of the contractual obligations as described by (Lando 2016). Breach of the performance causes the violation of a promise, and the aggrieved party holds the right not to accept such duty likely to extend the distress.Henrietta asked for mental relief from an existing problem where the solicitor firm had a simple duty to apply for an injunction over the party causing distress to their client. The firm not only showed their incompetence but even made the matter worse by handling it to one of the inexperienced and incompetent clerk. 3. The act caused termination of the promise as mentioned conditions and damage due to the same factor. Any breach entitled from such damage results in the termination of the contract. 4. The warranty of the contract was not taken care, and the party had to face a prolonged distress.5. Innominate te rms: the concept explains the intensity of the contractual damage caused to the party involved in the contract. The intensity explains the extremity of the damage caused and its depth to reach damage to the aggrieved party, Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd.6. The given matter explains about the frustration in the contract. The frustration explained as the mental distress and increase of the tensions occurred due to the unfulfillment of the contractual obligations. The given matter is related to the concept of the frustration because the incompetency of the clerk increased the problem that Henrietta faced for a long time. The matter became even worse instead of getting recovered. Conclusion: Considering the facts as mentioned for the given matter about Henrietta, the basic conclusion that can be drawn from the case is that the court does not excuse the party that caused a deliberate mental agony to the concerned party in the contract. Every mental distress matters must be compensated for the part of the party that caused such damage. It even suggests about the evolving and growing aspect of the contractual obligations to give importance to the aggrieved party in the agreement.The discussion in this matter explains about the intensity to understand the importance of the party in the contract. The introduction of the damage payment in the form of compensation has been mandatory so that the parties to the contract do not gets mislead with the terms and its interpretation. It is expected from the party to the contract must have a clear conception about the entire terms mentioned in the obligatory part and the language must be clear and any amendment of the terms are expected to inform the parties involved by the concerned party or the offeror. So, it is clear that Henrietta is liable to get the damages from the concerned solicitor firm. The concerned firm proved the incompetence by handling the matter to some inexperienced clerk further providing mental agony and worsening the condition of existing dispute. References: Andrews, N., 2015. Contract law. Cambridge University Press.Ayres, I., 2012. Studies in Contract Law. Foundation Press.Buell, S.W., DeMott, D.A., Cox, J.D., Young, E.A. and Lipton, A., 2014. Brief of Common Law Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents.Burrows, A., 2016. Illegality as a Defence in Contract. Available at SSRN 2758797.Carter, J.W., 2012. Cases and materials on contract law in Australia. LexisNexis Butterworths.Cartwright, J., 2014. Contract law: An introduction to the English law of contract for the civil lawyer. AC Black.Chen-Wishart, M., 2012. Contract law. Oxford University Press.Corones, S.G., 2013. The Australian Consumer Law. Thomson Reuters, Lawbook Co..Furmston, M.P., Cheshire, G.C. and Fifoot, C.H.S., 2012. Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston's law of contract. Oxford university press.Gergen, M.P., 2013. Negligent Misrepresentation as Contract. California Law Review, 1, p.953.Harder, S., 2014. Claims between a person liable for misrepresentation and the rep resentee's contract-partner. Journal of business law, (2), pp.121-139.Lando, H., 2016. Optimal rules of negligent misrepresentation in insurance contract law. International Review of Law and Economics, 46, pp.70-77.McKendrick, E., 2014. Contract law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press (UK).McLauchlan, D., 2015. Liability under Hedley Byrne for'pre-contract'negligent misrepresentation: a New Zealand perspective.Poole, J., 2014. Textbook on contract law. Oxford University Press, USA.Taskar, B.D., 2015. The Doctrine of Consideration.Turner, C., 2013. Unlocking contract law. Routledge.Willmott, L., Christensen, S., Butler, D. and Dixon, B., 2013. Contract law. Oxford University Press.

Should Tennagers Be Allowed to Get Birth Control free essay sample

This raises the question, should teenagers be allowed to receive birth control methods without their parents’ permission. The answer is teenage girls should not be allowed to receive birth control without parent consent. There are many reasons why birth control methods should not be available to teenagers without their parent’s knowledge. Among the reasons are because this encourages premarital sex, it hinders communication between parent and child, and it forces the child to make adult decisions about medication, and that can be harmful to the teen. Foremost, I believe it is appropriate to keep in mind that one is not granted the ability to vote until they reach the age of 18. Laws and procedures vary from state to state, even though most states do not have a law about receiving birth control methods. But the idea of teens making a decision to add medication into their daily lives is ridiculous, even more since the government has already determined that they are not ready to make an extremely important decision as far as voting. We will write a custom essay sample on Should Tennagers Be Allowed to Get Birth Control or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Therefore allowing teens to obtain prescription birth control without parents’ knowledge interferes with the parent/child relationship. There are rules and regulations that require government funded hospitals to contact parents if their teenager would like to receive prescription birth control and sometimes this encourage sexual activity among teenagers. I feel that if teenagers under 16, need have to have their parents’ consent to have surgery and to receive medical treatment, birth control should not excluded. Birth control should also be of importance. I believe that parents should know what activities their teenagers are participating in; and since the government holds the parents responsible for our children. Being a parent I feel the parent should have in the situation. I feel that any great parent should care about the interest of their child wants to know whether their teenage daughter is going to the public clinic to get receive birth control; and any good parent would want to help their teenager make the right choices and good decisions on the matter, and to help the teenager from making bad choices without the parents’ consent. Certain states have laws against people who are under the age of sixteen, when it comes to them having sex. Health risks that are associated with prescribed birth control make it unethical to allow children to obtain these medicines without parent consent. Common side effects of early usage of birth control include nutrient deficiency, weight gain, mood changes, and depression (www. kidshealth. org). A prescribed birth control method also puts users at a higher risk of PMS, depression, migraines, and all kind of maladies (www. womenhealth. org) due to the risk of developing yeast problems. But without having the proper research, a teenager really has no way of knowing or understanding the health risks that comes with taking birth control methods. Therefore, it is important that parents’ know and be involved in their children’s life decisions. Even though their argument is that birth control reduces the number of teen pregnancies, prescribed birth control does not protect an individual from STD’s. If teenagers were able to obtain prescription birth control without prenatal consent, we may actually see a jump in STD’s among teens. Teenagers that are sexually active are a problem that has to be addressed. Curiosity arises in the minds of teenager every, they want to know what sex is all about. My religion which is Christianity, instructs us to wait until they are married to have begun to have sex. But not only in churches is abstinence being preached, but public schools is adding this to their curriculum, and teaching the teenagers about the greatness of keeping their virginity. Teenagers having sex before marriage is a growing issue among teenagers. Sex before marriage is the cause of teenage pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases, and emotional distress. Sexually transmitted diseases show in a society of teenagers that are having premarital sex, because teenagers have so many different sex partners. Therefore, a result to teenagers having sex is the different disease which is becoming more common in the teenage population. Because, for this is that the teenagers don not know how to use the different birth control methods. Many teenagers believe that the pill or condoms stop the spread of AIDs, other diseases, and herpes so, the contraceptives do not prevent these diseases from spreading. Three million new cases of sexually transmitted diseases among teenagers are reported each year. (www. helpme. com) There are so many teens that feel that there is nothing wrong in having sex before marriage, but having sexual relations with numerous people from age 15 and 19 doubles the diseases that have been spreading to different people every time. Because teenagers are having more sexual relationships, it seems that it is being more accepted among the public, and this is causing even more teenagers to start in having sexual relationships. Many teens believed that they were pressured into having sex. But if the community has the strength to pressure teenagers into having sex, then society should be using education to help teach teenagers about how bad sex is before marriage. Teenagers that is engaging into sexual activities before marriage is a major cause of teenage pregnancy. Teenagers often believe that they cannot get pregnant, or being a parent cannot happen to them, but the teenage pregnancy rate is on the rise every year. Being careless is a great factoring in teenage pregnancy, whether it is the use of contraceptives, or choosing their sexual partner. Teenagers use the different methods of birth control wrong. Teenagers do not have the adult mentality to choose a partner they want to be with at their age, which causes them to make the wrong decisions about their partners, which cause them to make wrong decisions and here is an unwanted pregnancy. The majority of unwanted pregnancies occur because teenagers do not really do not see how easy it is to become pregnant, or how they should know how to use birth control methods correctly. A lot of teenagers feel that they love their significant other, and so they began plan for a baby but their focus is not to look at the financial obligations that follow. Sex before marriage can play a great role in a teenager’s emotional factor. Teenagers feel all kinds of, emotional loss after they engage into having sex before marriage. Some teenagers may not feel the emotions of having sex now, but as they get older, life begins to sink in. Rather the teenager experienced having an STD’s or an unplanned pregnancy, they began to regret and this causes the teen to feel bad about them and it causes depression. â€Å"In fact, a great number of teens, active in sexual relationships, and ninety percent actually regret their choices to have sex (www. helpme. com)†. Teenagers feel the shame when their relationship ends because, having sex before marriage is a great causes of depression among teenagers and the parents that feel they are responsible for their childish choices. Many teenagers claim, that abstinence is not cool and that being abstinent is impossible but I am here to tell you it only takes one word â€Å"NO†! They are economically dependent, and the teen moms are not able to spend time with their children. Whether the parents know that their child is pregnant this really affects the women emotionally and psychologically, her ability to continue going to school, and her finances are affected. Parents should be able to make sure they get all the love that their teenagers need. If the teenagers parents do not know are not aware, there is a problem that the parents and their teenage daughters bond will be messed up at a time when parental support is most important. Now in some cases, I feel that the teenager might not want to tell her parents that she needs birth control or that she is engaging into sexual activities, for example, if a teen has been abused by their parents maybe if they were to tell their parents they would feel threatened for their safety. This may be a circumstance which could get the law involved, it should not be taken advantage of to make it seem like the parents should be consulted over whether underage children should be able to receive birth control or not. For teenagers nearly around the ages of 16 to 18 the case for parental consent is clearly less convincing. There has to be a line drawn somewhere because society has these teenagers feeling they can do whatever they feel and it’s not right. I grew up in a very religious family, and of course my mother did not believe in having sex before marriage. That is why I feel that teenagers both boys and girls should not be able to receive any kind of birth control without their parents knowing. I feel that when a teenage should decide to worry about contraceptives parents should be notified. Too many things are going on in today’s society. And this just helps with the parent and child relationship because a parent and a child should have a bond that is unbreakable